NewPlayerElo now rates women's footballExplore →

Liga Profesional Argentina · Clausura - 12

Tigre 1–2 Banfield

Sat 10 Oct 2026 · 22:15 UTC · Estadio Jose Dellagiovanna, Buenos Aires

Tigre crestTigreTeam 1682
1–2
Full time
HT 1–2
Banfield crestBanfieldTeam 1521

Match story

Tigre · draw · Banfield

Before kick-off: 55% · 26% · 19%

Live chances: Tigre 0%, draw 3%, Banfield 97% at 90+5'2' · 0–0 · Tigre 55%, draw 26%, Banfield 19%3' · 0–0 · Tigre 55%, draw 27%, Banfield 19%4' · 0–0 · Tigre 55%, draw 27%, Banfield 19%5' · 0–0 · Tigre 54%, draw 27%, Banfield 19%6' · 0–0 · Tigre 54%, draw 27%, Banfield 19%7' · 0–1 · Tigre 34%, draw 27%, Banfield 38%8' · 0–1 · Tigre 34%, draw 27%, Banfield 39%9' · 0–1 · Tigre 34%, draw 27%, Banfield 39%10' · 1–1 · Tigre 53%, draw 28%, Banfield 19%11' · 1–1 · Tigre 53%, draw 28%, Banfield 19%12' · 1–1 · Tigre 53%, draw 28%, Banfield 19%13' · 1–1 · Tigre 53%, draw 28%, Banfield 19%14' · 1–1 · Tigre 52%, draw 29%, Banfield 19%15' · 1–1 · Tigre 52%, draw 29%, Banfield 19%16' · 1–1 · Tigre 52%, draw 29%, Banfield 19%17' · 1–1 · Tigre 52%, draw 29%, Banfield 19%18' · 1–1 · Tigre 52%, draw 29%, Banfield 19%19' · 1–1 · Tigre 51%, draw 30%, Banfield 19%20' · 1–1 · Tigre 51%, draw 30%, Banfield 19%21' · 1–1 · Tigre 51%, draw 30%, Banfield 19%22' · 1–1 · Tigre 51%, draw 30%, Banfield 19%23' · 1–1 · Tigre 50%, draw 30%, Banfield 19%24' · 1–1 · Tigre 50%, draw 31%, Banfield 19%25' · 1–1 · Tigre 50%, draw 31%, Banfield 19%26' · 1–1 · Tigre 50%, draw 31%, Banfield 19%27' · 1–1 · Tigre 49%, draw 31%, Banfield 19%28' · 1–1 · Tigre 49%, draw 32%, Banfield 19%29' · 1–1 · Tigre 49%, draw 32%, Banfield 19%30' · 1–1 · Tigre 49%, draw 32%, Banfield 19%31' · 1–1 · Tigre 48%, draw 32%, Banfield 19%32' · 1–1 · Tigre 48%, draw 33%, Banfield 19%33' · 1–1 · Tigre 48%, draw 33%, Banfield 19%34' · 1–1 · Tigre 47%, draw 33%, Banfield 19%35' · 1–1 · Tigre 47%, draw 34%, Banfield 19%36' · 1–2 · Tigre 24%, draw 29%, Banfield 47%37' · 1–2 · Tigre 24%, draw 29%, Banfield 47%38' · 1–2 · Tigre 23%, draw 29%, Banfield 47%39' · 1–2 · Tigre 23%, draw 29%, Banfield 48%40' · 1–2 · Tigre 22%, draw 30%, Banfield 48%41' · 1–2 · Tigre 22%, draw 30%, Banfield 48%42' · 1–2 · Tigre 22%, draw 30%, Banfield 49%43' · 1–2 · Tigre 21%, draw 30%, Banfield 49%44' · 1–2 · Tigre 21%, draw 30%, Banfield 50%45' · 1–2 · Tigre 20%, draw 30%, Banfield 50%45+1' · 1–2 · Tigre 20%, draw 30%, Banfield 50%45+2' · 1–2 · Tigre 20%, draw 30%, Banfield 51%45+3' · 1–2 · Tigre 19%, draw 30%, Banfield 51%HT · 1–2 · Tigre 19%, draw 30%, Banfield 52%46' · 1–2 · Tigre 19%, draw 30%, Banfield 52%47' · 1–2 · Tigre 18%, draw 30%, Banfield 52%48' · 1–2 · Tigre 18%, draw 30%, Banfield 52%49' · 1–2 · Tigre 17%, draw 30%, Banfield 53%50' · 1–2 · Tigre 17%, draw 30%, Banfield 53%51' · 1–2 · Tigre 16%, draw 29%, Banfield 54%52' · 1–2 · Tigre 16%, draw 29%, Banfield 55%53' · 1–2 · Tigre 16%, draw 29%, Banfield 55%54' · 1–2 · Tigre 15%, draw 29%, Banfield 56%55' · 1–2 · Tigre 14%, draw 29%, Banfield 56%56' · 1–2 · Tigre 14%, draw 29%, Banfield 57%57' · 1–2 · Tigre 13%, draw 29%, Banfield 58%58' · 1–2 · Tigre 13%, draw 29%, Banfield 58%59' · 1–2 · Tigre 12%, draw 29%, Banfield 59%60' · 1–2 · Tigre 12%, draw 28%, Banfield 60%61' · 1–2 · Tigre 11%, draw 28%, Banfield 60%62' · 1–2 · Tigre 11%, draw 28%, Banfield 61%63' · 1–2 · Tigre 11%, draw 28%, Banfield 62%64' · 1–2 · Tigre 10%, draw 28%, Banfield 62%65' · 1–2 · Tigre 10%, draw 27%, Banfield 63%66' · 1–2 · Tigre 9%, draw 27%, Banfield 64%67' · 1–2 · Tigre 9%, draw 27%, Banfield 64%68' · 1–2 · Tigre 8%, draw 26%, Banfield 65%69' · 1–2 · Tigre 8%, draw 26%, Banfield 66%70' · 1–2 · Tigre 7%, draw 26%, Banfield 67%71' · 1–2 · Tigre 7%, draw 25%, Banfield 68%72' · 1–2 · Tigre 7%, draw 25%, Banfield 68%73' · 1–2 · Tigre 6%, draw 25%, Banfield 69%74' · 1–2 · Tigre 6%, draw 24%, Banfield 70%75' · 1–2 · Tigre 5%, draw 24%, Banfield 71%76' · 1–2 · Tigre 5%, draw 23%, Banfield 72%77' · 1–2 · Tigre 5%, draw 22%, Banfield 73%78' · 1–2 · Tigre 4%, draw 22%, Banfield 74%79' · 1–2 · Tigre 4%, draw 21%, Banfield 75%80' · 1–2 · Tigre 4%, draw 21%, Banfield 76%81' · 1–2 · Tigre 3%, draw 20%, Banfield 77%82' · 1–2 · Tigre 3%, draw 19%, Banfield 78%83' · 1–2 · Tigre 3%, draw 18%, Banfield 79%84' · 1–2 · Tigre 2%, draw 17%, Banfield 80%85' · 1–2 · Tigre 2%, draw 16%, Banfield 81%86' · 1–2 · Tigre 2%, draw 16%, Banfield 83%87' · 1–2 · Tigre 1%, draw 15%, Banfield 84%88' · 1–2 · Tigre 1%, draw 13%, Banfield 85%89' · 1–2 · Tigre 1%, draw 12%, Banfield 87%90' · 1–2 · Tigre 1%, draw 11%, Banfield 88%90+1' · 1–2 · Tigre 1%, draw 10%, Banfield 90%90+2' · 1–2 · Tigre 0%, draw 8%, Banfield 92%90+3' · 1–2 · Tigre 0%, draw 6%, Banfield 93%90+4' · 1–2 · Tigre 0%, draw 5%, Banfield 95%90+5' · 1–2 · Tigre 0%, draw 3%, Banfield 97%

Last reading, 90+5': 0% · 3% · 97%

Live chances from PlayerElo's pre-match model and the current score.

We gave Tigre 55% to win: Banfield won.

  1. 6'Banfield:Adrián Balboa 1632 +44
  2. 10'Tigre:Jerónimo Domina 1536 0 assist Santiago Lopez Grobin 1724 −8
  3. 29'Banfield:David Zalazar 1623 +17
  4. 29'Tigre:Luciano Minniti 1529
  5. 30'Tigre:Santiago Lopez Grobin 1724 −8
  6. 36'Banfield:Tomas Adoryan 1634 +57 assist Santiago Esquivel 1624 +60
  7. 45'Banfield:Juan Luis Alfaro 1386 +42
  8. 45+2'Tigre:Jerónimo Domina 1536 0
  9. 54'Banfield:Thomas Rodríguez 1488 +2* for Federico Medina 1415 +23
  10. 71'Banfield:Brandon Oviedo 1537 −2* for Lisandro Geronimo Piñero 1515 +23
  11. 73'Tigre:Alfio Oviedo 1539 −2 for Santiago Lopez Grobin 1724 −8
  12. 78'Tigre:Manuel Fernández 1469 0 for Valentín Moreno 1741 −10
  13. 78'Tigre:Martin Garay 1771 −3 for Jerónimo Domina 1536 0
  14. 80'Banfield:Jeremías Acosta 1377 −3* for Adrián Balboa 1632 +44
  15. 80'Banfield:Nehuén Paz 1618 −10* for David Zalazar 1623 +17
  16. 85'Banfield:Tomas Adoryan 1634 +57
  17. 90+2'Tigre:Juan Villalba 1554 −8* for Federico Alvarez 1701 −11

Line-ups

Elo change from this match, next to the Elo after it.

4-4-2Formations4-2-3-1
GF. Zenobio1757−13
DV. Moreno1741−10
DJ. Laso1680−14
DA. Barrionuevo1725−18
DF. Álvarez1701−11
MJ. Saralegui1729−32
MS. González1732−11
MB. Leyes1743−12
MS. López1724−8
FI. Russo1758−31
CD. Dabove1722−19
DJ. Alfaro1386+42
DS. Daniele1555+79
DN. Meriano1675+17
DI. Abraham1654+15
MT. Adoryán1634+57
MD. Zalazar1623+17
FA. Balboa1632+44
CP. Troglio1670+30
Before kick-off: 55% · 26% · 19%(Tigre · draw · Banfield)
HomeDrawAway

Our most likely score was 1–1 (13%); the result 1–2 had 5%.

  • Average value of the starting XI: Tigre €1.2M, Banfield €426K.

Form

Last five matches; the number is the team Elo of the eleven that started.

Tigre

10th in Liga Profesional · 20 pts from 16

  • 4 OctLArgentinos JRS 1740
  • 21 SepLVelez Sarsfield 1736
  • 13 SepLRosario Central 1751
  • 5 SepLGimnasia L.P. 1760
  • 1 SepDBarracas Central 1769

Banfield

12th in Liga Profesional · 18 pts from 16

  • 6 OctDRosario Central 1546
  • 19 SepDGimnasia L.P. 1548
  • 14 SepDBarracas Central 1574
  • 5 SepLAldosivi 1551
  • 30 AugLRiver Plate 1557

Season outlook

From the Liga Profesional Argentina simulation, before this match.

ClubPts nowPred. ptsTitleTop 4Bottom 3Most likely
Tigre20 /1627.30%0%0%16th
Banfield18 /1622.80%0%1%24th
Tigre
Banfield

Each bar is one finishing position, 1st on the left to 30th on the right; the taller the bar, the likelier that finish.

Full table and finishing odds: Liga Profesional Argentina

Players to watch

Highest (Elo Above Replacement over the last 180 days) in each starting eleven. Elo after each match, last three years.

F. Álvarez
F. Álvarez

Tigre · +2.1 (Good) · Elo 1712

D. Zalazar
D. Zalazar

Banfield · +1.3 (Good) · Elo 1606

Team Elo history

Starting-eleven Team Elo in league matches, last three years.

Coach Elo history

Elo after each match, last three years (the whole career if shorter).

Diego Omar Dabove

Coach DNA: balanced profile

Pedro Antonio Troglio

Coach DNA: balanced profile

Playing style

How both clubs play against their own league (2024–2026).

Tigre: balanced profile (how Diego Omar Dabove plays) · Banfield: direct (how Pedro Antonio Troglio plays)

* Includes our monthly adjustment: every month we take a little off each player's Elo to keep ratings from inflating.